used with emission filters to capture specific wavelength ranges
Color camera - Bayer filter array (BFA)
Bayer filter array (BFA) is a color filter pattern to capture color information.
It consists of a grid of red, green, and blue filters arranged in a specific pattern over the camera’s sensor.
Each pixel on the sensor captures light filtered through one of these colored filters
Interpolation of neighboring pixels generates a smooth representation of a colored field of view.
Bayer filter array
Mosaicing
Demosaicing: color interpolation
Color camera - limitations
Each pixel effectively captures only 1/3 of incoming light, leading to reduced sensitivity compared to monochrome cameras
The color information is not directly captured but rather inferred through interpolation, so cannot accurately extract the precise intensity values for further image analysis.
Monochrome camera
Each pixel captures the full intensity of incoming light, resulting in higher sensitivity and better signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) compared to color cameras.
These cameras are used for fluorescence imaging and quantitative analysis, as they provide more accurate intensity measurements without the need for interpolation.
Used in combinations with dichroic mirrors and emission filters to capture specific wavelength ranges, allowing for multi-channel imaging and analysis of different fluorophores.
Used in transmitted-light techniques for better contrast and resolution.
Used in scientific research and applications where accurate intensity measurements are critical, such as in cell biology, neuroscience, and materials science.
Each pixel of the CCD image sensor is composed of a photodiode and a potential well, which can be thought of as a bucket for photoelectrons.
This wavelength dependent conversion of light to photoelectrons is specified as the quantum efficiency (QE).
Photoelectrons accumulate in each bucket until it’s time for readout, when all of the photoelectrons are relayed from one bucket to the next down each row of pixels.
The charge is gathered pixel-by-pixel—serially—into a container at the end of the relay.
Once in the container, the photoelectrons are converted into voltage and processed into an image on the camera circuit board.
Because the photoelectrons are converted into signal (voltage) at a common port, the speed of image acquisition is limited.
EMCCD camera
https://www.teledynevisionsolutions.com
Similar to CCD except that they have an on-chip electron multiplication register that amplifies the signal before readout, allowing for detection of very low light levels.
Because the photoelectrons are converted into signal (voltage) at a common port, the speed of image acquisition is limited.
sCMOS camera
https://camera.hamamatsu.com
In contrast with CCD and EMCCD sensors, each pixel of a CMOS image sensor is composed of a photodiode-amplifier pair.
Unlike a CCD sensor, photoelectrons are converted into voltage by each pixel’s photodiode-amplifier pair.
Because conversion to voltage happens in parallel instead of serially (CCD), image acquisition can be much faster for CMOS sensors.
scientific CMOS sensors combines high QE with fast frame rates and low noise, which translates into high speed, high-resolution biological images, even in low light situations.
For almost all applications, newer sCMOS cameras are a great choice, but for ultra-low light (single fluorescent molecules) EMCCDs may still be better.
Camera noise
Random degradation of any image due to the inherent uncertainty of photon detection.
Mainly three types of noises in microscopy cameras:
Shot noise
Dark noise
Read noise
Shot noise
Uncertainty in the arrival of photons
Arrival of any given photon is independent and cannot be precisely predicted
The probability of its arrival is governed by a Poisson distribution
It is most apparent at low signal levels, where the number of detected photons is small
Shot noise can be reduced by collecting more photons, either with longer exposure times or by combining multiple frames, but this may not always be feasible due to photobleaching or phototoxicity in live samples.
Dark noise
Uncertainty in the photon-to-electron conversion process.
Generated by thermal electrons in the camera sensor even in the absence of light.
Also governed by a Poisson distribution.
Becomes a problem for long exposure such as in bioluminescence imaging.
Temperature-dependent: can be reduced by cooling the camera sensor.
Convert electrons to photons \[\text{Photons} = \frac{\text{Photoelectrons}}{\text{QE}}\]
need to know the camera offset, gain and quantum efficiency (QE) of the camera sensor for the specific wavelength
Image display vs image analysis
Image display
Images are usually enhanced for better visualization (human eye) of features of interest
qualitative assessment of the features of interest in the image
typically figure panels for publications, presentations etc.
Tools:
brightness/contrast
Lookup table (LUT)
Converting image (16/32 bit) to RGB
Image display vs image analysis
Image analysis
quantitative measurement of features of interest
Cell/nuclei counting, fluorescence intensity, shape etc.
It’s best to avoid any photo editing software (Photoshop, GIMP etc.)
Any visual enhancement (pixel value change) is prohibited, except…
Caveats: certain image enhancements are allowed:
image processing filters (e.g. Gaussian blur, median filter, gamma etc.). Original image must be used for intensity measurement.
deconvolution
make sure to apply the same image processing to all the images in a dataset, including controls and experimental groups, to avoid bias
All image processing steps should be properly described in the methods section and/or figure legend of the paper.
Resource: preparing images and describing image analyses for publication
Can you tell which images are the same
and which are different?
Brightness and contrast settings are different for the two images, but the pixel values are identical.
Next: let’s checkout the histograms of all 6 images. In Fiji, go to: Analyze > Histogram (or Press H)
Image display vs image analysis
Images that look the same may have different pixel values.
Images that look different may have identical pixel values.
When in doubt, check:
Histogram
Brightness and Contrast
Lookup table (LUT)
Changing image bit-depth
Why would you want to change the bit-depth of an image?
to save space (rarely)
Because a particular ImageJ/Fiji plugin only works with 8/16/32-bit images (most common reason!)
so that a large image could be completely loaded into RAM for quick visualization.
in Fiji, go to Edit > Options > Conversions...
By default this setting is checked ON.
Image Metadata
Some metadata is displayed under the image title.
Mouse embryonic fibroblast stained with Phalloidin
A bit more metadata could be found under: Image > Properties
Image Metadata (detailed)
Plugins > Bio-Formats > Bio-Formats Importer
Image Metadata (detailed)
metadata as key/value pairs
Image Metadata (detailed)
metadata in OME-XML format
Noise reduction: AI-Denoising
Various AI-denoising methods have been developed by training deep learning models on:
pairs of noisy (low SNR) and clean (high SNR) images
CARE (Content-Aware Image Restoration)
RCAN (Residual Channel Attention Networks, from AIVIA)
pairs of noisy images - Noise2Noise (N2N)
Single noisy images - Noise2Void (N2V)
Problems with AI-denoising:
AI can create, alter, or hallucinate features that do not exist in the raw data, producing images that look realistic but are scientifically inaccurate.
Resource-intensive: model training requires hundreds to thousands of paired (noisy/clean) images to train effectively
Some methods such as Noise2Void fail to remove structured noise
concept of deconvolution https://zeiss-campus.magnet.fsu.edu/articles/basics/psf.html
Noise reduction: Deconvolution
A mathematical operation that reverses the effects of convolution (blurring due to out of focus light) in an image, using the point spread function (PSF) of the imaging system.
Does not require deep learning model training, so it is less computationally-intensive than AI-denoising
It does require accurate estimation of the PSF for optimal results.
Deconvolution can improve image resolution and contrast without introducing hallucinations, as it is based on the physical properties of the imaging system rather than learned patterns from data.
Overall, Deconvolution is a more reliable method for noise reduction in microscopy images compared to AI-denoising.